The average velocities were estimated by averaging together, in the case of the Fourier technique, values from 28 cylindrical cuts along a single surface (n = 2) at values of k separated by the spatial Nyquist frequency. With the Ring diagram technique, rings corresponding to the same surface from 28 frequency-plane cuts were used, at values of w separated by the temporal Nyquist frequency. Results for one data sample, the nine-hour time series of data from Jun 22, 1993 used in the ``hound & hare exercise'' described in Paper 1, are shown in Table 1. This region is centered at Carrington longitude 135, approaching central meridian at the end of the day, and at latitude -25. The region has an extent of about 30 degrees (256*256 pixels with a scale at the map center of 0.12 heliographic degree/pixel). In Paper 1 we used the differences between this and other deliberately mistracked fields to demonstrate the linearity of both methods and establish the agreement of the constant of proportionality relating the determined frequency variations to velocities. The present result seems to establish that whatever constant offset may exist between the real and the inferred velocity at least does not differ in the two techniques. This is important to demonstrate, since the typical average velocities inferred are several hundred meters per second relative to the supposedly stationary photosphere.
Using the Fourier technique we have explored multiple regions on the solar disc concurrently and extended the analysis over the full 4 days' of data. These data are presented in Table 2. Typically the averaged velocities are in the 50-200 m/s range, with statistical uncertainties of 30-60 m/s, so the results are statistically significant. It can be seen that there is often good agreement between the velocities of adjacent regions and between the velocities of the same region on successive days, but that there are sometimes significant discontinuities in these patterns. Also, large uncertainies in direction are often, but not always, correlated with small absolute velocities.
The consistency of the velocities in both time and space with occasional discontinuities is what would be expected if we are detecting large-scale organized, slowly-evolving flow fields, such as giant cells. It is important to extend these measurements to observations covering a large fraction of a solar rotation in order to determine that they are not related to systematic errors having to do with either disc location or contamination of the signal by active regions. It would also be useful to compare estimates for overlapping regions of different sizes.
It should be remembered that these results are preliminary. More careful calibration is required, we need to investigate sources of systematic errors, and we also need to verify the appropriate tracking rates to use in mapping. The most glaring deficiency in the present estimates, however, and one that commands urgent attention, is the lack of any inversion. The results presented are merely based on averages of frequency shifts over a fairly large set of modes. There are cases where there is quite large uncertainty in the velocity direction (based on the standard deviation of the contributing modes) even though the average velocities are quite high. These cases in particular are suggestive of the possibility of shear flows with depth.
method v_x v_y |v| angle Fourier -116 +134 177 -49 Ring -107 +103 149 -44
heliocentric Date lon lat |v| angle 6/22 -21 -21 215 ± 40 98 ± 15 0 -30 225 55 139 22 +21 -21 155 45 113 98 -30 0 230 45 71 15 0 0 160 35 83 17 +30 0 75 40 42 78 -21 +21 195 35 85 18 0 +30 140 45 99 21 +21 +21 105 45 62 50 6/23 -21 -21 130 ± 45 98 ± 15 0 -30 185 55 9 167 +21 -21 160 50 -116 75 -30 0 155 35 67 27 0 0 65 30 -3 95 +30 0 120 40 -70 27 -21 +21 125 45 67 36 0 +30 70 35 29 91 +21 +21 90 45 -56 63 6/24 -21 -21 185 ± 45 128 ± 99 0 -30 265 40 -41 164 +21 -21 200 60 -149 14 -30 0 105 35 105 24 0 0 65 35 -19 131 +30 0 120 55 -101 32 -21 +21 95 30 96 28 0 +30 60 25 19 129 +21 +21 85 40 -96 34 6/25 -21 -21 185 ± 45 162 ± 12 0 -30 260 55 -131 103 +21 -21 175 50 -127 59 -30 0 120 40 112 21 0 0 40 20 -60 27 +30 0 120 40 -79 27 -21 +21 105 45 105 37 0 +30 75 30 76 114 +21 +21 65 30 -62 57